sepa_debit_overdue fired unconditionally for every overdue SEPA claim past the
grace period, regardless of whether a reminder had already been sent for it --
so a Rücklastschrift-Mahnung created via the reminder mechanism made no
difference to the housekeeper output. Check for an already-sent reminder whose
own payment deadline hasn't expired yet first; if there is one, show a
low-priority "Rücklastschriftklärung läuft" note instead, mirroring the
non-SEPA "reminder_awaiting_deadline" fix. Once that deadline passes without
resolution, the plain sepa_debit_overdue notice returns.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An overdue claim whose reminder had already been sent, with that reminder's own
payment deadline still running, fell through to the plain "überfällig" error
finding whenever reminder_due's escalation check returned None to signal "not
yet time for the next Mahnstufe" -- that None was indistinguishable from "never
handled at all" to the caller, so it looked neglected even though a reminder was
already out. Give that case its own low-priority "reminder_awaiting_deadline"
finding instead of silently falling back to the overdue-error path.
Birthday and membership-anniversary findings also kept firing for members whose
status is "ended", which doesn't make sense once the membership itself is over.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The claim-status and reminder-due housekeeper rules used to run
independently, so once a claim was both overdue and past its dunning
grace period, both a generic "überfällig" task and a "Mahnung fällig"
task showed up for the same problem. Rules can't see each other's
output, so the fix is to give reminder-due sole ownership of the whole
overdue lifecycle: a plain overdue notice during the grace period, then
either the dunning escalation or a fallback overdue notice (dunning
hold active, or waiting between reminder levels) -- never both at once.
claim-status now only handles claims that aren't overdue yet ("bald
fällig").
Members with an active SEPA mandate get a new sepa_debit_overdue finding
instead of the postal dunning escalation once a claim is past its grace
period, since mailing a Mahnung makes no sense for a member who pays by
direct debit -- the board needs to check/retrigger the debit instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marcel PeterkauandClaude Sonnet 5