A Rücklastschrift is still the member's own failure to ensure cover or
provide valid bank details, so it belongs in the same escalation ladder
as a regular reminder -- it now occupies whatever level the claim is next
due for, alongside a "Rücklastschrift" preset next to the existing
Mahnstufe presets.
Mahnung vorbereiten no longer lets the board pick a level (it's computed
automatically from what's already been sent, since the sequencing was
already server-enforced) and replaces the single fee field with a small
items table (Beschreibung + Betrag), so a reminder can carry several
charges at once -- e.g. Rücklastschriftgebühr plus Bankgebühr plus Porto
-- each landing on the claim as its own line item instead of one lump
sum under a generic label. The description field offers the configured
standard texts but stays free-editable.
Those standard texts and amounts, plus the dunning levels themselves
(name/fee/deadline), are now configurable from Optionen -> Mahnungen
instead of only being editable by hand-editing repository.json, which
was the case for the whole reminder policy until now. Cleaned up
reminder_fee/failed_debit_fee on contribution rules while at it -- both
were unused leftovers superseded by this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The claim-status and reminder-due housekeeper rules used to run
independently, so once a claim was both overdue and past its dunning
grace period, both a generic "überfällig" task and a "Mahnung fällig"
task showed up for the same problem. Rules can't see each other's
output, so the fix is to give reminder-due sole ownership of the whole
overdue lifecycle: a plain overdue notice during the grace period, then
either the dunning escalation or a fallback overdue notice (dunning
hold active, or waiting between reminder levels) -- never both at once.
claim-status now only handles claims that aren't overdue yet ("bald
fällig").
Members with an active SEPA mandate get a new sepa_debit_overdue finding
instead of the postal dunning escalation once a claim is past its grace
period, since mailing a Mahnung makes no sense for a member who pays by
direct debit -- the board needs to check/retrigger the debit instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marcel PeterkauandClaude Sonnet 5