validate_mail_template() only looked at placeholder names, and "{{#claims}}" is
not a placeholder -- so an unclosed block or a stray "{{/claims}}" passed the
check and rendered as itself: the member would read the marker in their mail.
Repeat markers are now checked structurally: every one names a block the template
actually has, openers and closers pair up in order, blocks do not nest (the
renderer does not support it either), and the subject takes no markers at all.
Each case explains what is wrong and what is missing.
The same check runs before sending, not just before saving: the templates are
plain files in the store and can be edited outside CCMA, where refusing to send
beats mailing a marker. Saving several edited templates now validates all of
them before writing the first, so a mistake in one no longer leaves the others
half-saved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The placeholder chooser showed repeat blocks as "{{#claims}} … {{/claims}}" and
inserted exactly that on double-click -- the ellipsis is a label, so the saved
template rendered a literal "…" per claim instead of the claim.
Chooser rows are data now: each carries the text it reads as and, separately,
the snippet it inserts. A block contributes a complete, ready-to-edit block with
a sample line built from its own placeholders, and lands on a line of its own
when the cursor sits behind existing text.
Covered from both sides: the snippets are checked against the template validator
and renderer, and a UI test drives the real dialog -- insert, save, send -- and
asserts the mail carries actual claim lines. The Tk tests share one root (the
icon library binds its images to the first one) and skip without a display.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The wording of the dunning and SEPA pre-notification mails was hard-coded in
Python, so adjusting a single sentence required a new release. Both texts now
live in plain text templates that ship as defaults, are copied into the store's
templates/mail/ directory on first start and can be edited there or under
Optionen -> E-Mail-Vorlagen; an existing file is never overwritten and a deleted
one is restored from the shipped default.
A template carries its subject in the first line and the body after a blank
line. Placeholders use the same {{ ... }} syntax as the document templates and
share their member/organization values, so a name means the same thing in a
letter and in the mail that carries it. Unknown placeholders are rejected while
editing instead of during a send run, a line holding nothing but placeholders
that render empty is dropped, and {{#claims}} ... {{/claims}} repeats per entry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Rücklastschrift is still the member's own failure to ensure cover or
provide valid bank details, so it belongs in the same escalation ladder
as a regular reminder -- it now occupies whatever level the claim is next
due for, alongside a "Rücklastschrift" preset next to the existing
Mahnstufe presets.
Mahnung vorbereiten no longer lets the board pick a level (it's computed
automatically from what's already been sent, since the sequencing was
already server-enforced) and replaces the single fee field with a small
items table (Beschreibung + Betrag), so a reminder can carry several
charges at once -- e.g. Rücklastschriftgebühr plus Bankgebühr plus Porto
-- each landing on the claim as its own line item instead of one lump
sum under a generic label. The description field offers the configured
standard texts but stays free-editable.
Those standard texts and amounts, plus the dunning levels themselves
(name/fee/deadline), are now configurable from Optionen -> Mahnungen
instead of only being editable by hand-editing repository.json, which
was the case for the whole reminder policy until now. Cleaned up
reminder_fee/failed_debit_fee on contribution rules while at it -- both
were unused leftovers superseded by this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Members are sometimes given a fee that deviates from the regular
schedule -- e.g. a reduced rate for students -- for a specific period.
Add a per-member "Beitrag" tab where such deviations can be recorded
with a month-granular date range (Ab/Bis), a mandatory reason, and
either a fixed annual amount or a percentage discount off whichever
base rate is in effect at the time.
Data model: ContributionData gets a contribution_overrides list, each
entry validated (month format, Bis >= Ab, non-overlapping ranges per
member, reason required) and CRUD'd through the repository
(record/update/delete/get_contribution_override), consistent with how
donations already work.
Integration: contribution_claims.py now computes each membership-fee
claim's amount month by month instead of a single rate for the whole
billing period, picking up whichever override (if any) covers each
individual month. That handles an override starting or ending mid
period correctly (e.g. a semiannual payer whose discount begins in
March) without changing behavior for members without overrides.
Already-created claims are never recalculated retroactively, matching
how changes to the global contribution rates already behave.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claims could previously only be cancelled (stornieren), which blocks once a
payment is allocated. Add a hard delete that releases any linked
payments/credits back to being unallocated instead of destroying them.
Payments could only be created from within a claim, forcing immediate
allocation. Add a bare payment creation flow in the Zahlungen tab so
incoming transfers can be logged first and allocated later.
Add a per-member Spenden tab (donations, backed by a new donations list on
ContributionData) so amounts paid beyond the membership fee can be tracked
and existing free payments allocated to them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marcel PeterkauandClaude Opus 5
Marcel Peterkau